Subject: Overlapping, polygonal FOs From: Ingo Macherius <Ingo.Macherius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 03:38:14 +0200 (MET DST) |
In response to my XML-article (english translation is work in progress) a reader asked, if a flow object can have a polygonal border (compared to rectangular) and if FOs may overlap. I guess he was comparing FO with the Netscape <layer>-tag. In my (quite limited) DSSSL understanding 1) FOs never overlap but include themselves (that is: a FOT is a special grove) 2) FO's are always rectangles I remember the second point was subject to discussion and polygonal-border FOs were added on the TODO-list for a DSSSL revision. Q1: Is my understanding correct ? Q2: What is the DSSSL/FOT way to represent <layer> like layout (including things like transparency). Thanks in advance, ++im -- Snail : Ingo Macherius // L'Aigler Platz 4 // D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld Mail : Ingo.Macherius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WWW: http://www.tu-clausthal.de/~inim/ Information!=Knowledge!=Wisdom!=Truth!=Beauty!=Love!=Music==BEST (Frank Zappa) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Is DSSSL Syntax Tricky?, Jacques Deseyne | Thread | Re: Overlapping, polygonal FOs, James Clark |
Re: Is DSSSL Syntax Tricky?, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: Is DSSSL Syntax Tricky?, lee |
Month |