Subject: Re: XS: Construction Rule Features From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 09:49:07 +0700 |
At 21:44 24/05/97 -0400, Paul Prescod wrote: >You already have to handle consruction rules with the same specifity >whether or not you allow attributes to be attached to construction >rules Actually not. The main motivating factor for designing element construction rules to be as simple as they are now is that it makes it impossible to have a single element matching two different element construction rules with the same specificity. It's also an error to have more than one occurrence of the same element construction rule in a single part of a DSSSL specification. James DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XS: Construction Rule Features, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: XS: Construction Rule Features, Paul Prescod |
Re: DSSSL Design Question, James Clark | Date | Re: XS: Construction Rule Features, Paul Prescod |
Month |