Subject: Re: XS: needed features? From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 17:53:35 +0100 (BST) |
> Nobody is voting against math in XML. MathML will do the job for > Netscape share prices. You should demonstrate not just that math is > important, but that *generic* math is important. If a browser supports construction of formulae, it seems a pity not to interpose the layer we all approve of, viz the style sheet and the abstract flow objects. Unless there is a huge discrepancy between DSSSL's math flow objects, and what can be coerced from MathML markup, I would always argue it is counter-productive to hard-wire the solution. Sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XS: needed features?, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: XS: needed features?, James Clark |
DSSSList archive search page, DSSSList Owner | Date | Re: XS: Ports --> math, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |