Subject: Re: XS: Guidelines for the discussion From: lex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alex Milowski) Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 21:50:29 -0500 (CDT) |
Paul Prescod wrote: > Alex Milowski wrote: > > Well, the descrition of the transformation language in the ISO > > standard is rather terse. I would love to be able to deliver client > > side transformation applications and that is why I brought it up. > > I understand that *expecting* a major browser vendor to implement it > > is a long shot but *if* we standardize it we have a better chance. In > > addition, in the SGML community, we have an additional way to interchange > > SGML applications over the web. > > Well, the transformation language exists: what would be changed for a > Web version? It doesn't seem very dependant on media. Well, the three things that come to mind are: * association of transformations (note the plural) with documents, * association of transformation/document pairs with user semantics (e.g. "Summary version"), and * location of ancillary documents in a multiple document transformation-- web-oriented entity management. ============================================================================== R. Alexander Milowski http://www.copsol.com/ alex@xxxxxxxxxx Copernican Solutions Incorporated (612) 379 - 3608 DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XS: Guidelines for the discussi, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: XS: Guidelines for the discuss, lee |
Re: DSSSL Math Question, Tony Graham | Date | XS: needed features? -Reply, David Pawson |
Month |