Re: Orthoganlity Questions

[James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 16:21 28/03/97 +0100, Norbert Mikula wrote:

>James, I think we ought to include this sub-DTD here :
> 
><!ENTITY % declarations "features | baseset-encoding |
>literal-described-char | add-name-chars | add-separator-chars |
>standard-chars | other-chars | combine-char | map-sdata-entity |
>char-repertoire | sgml-grove-plan" >
> 
>What do you think ?. I am not an expert on architectural forms.
>So I am not sure how to approach this problem (if there is
>one....)

You don't need to change the meta-DTD for the DSSSL architecture. You only
need to change the DTD used by the stylesheet.  A DSSSL engine should be
able to accept a style sheet using any DTD so long as it conforms to the
DSSSL architecture.

James