Subject: Re: Lazy Evaluation From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:49:55 -0400 |
James Clark wrote: > >This brings us back to functional programming languages. In DSSSL, > >basically only nodelists (and sosofos?) are lazy. > > In Jade both node-lists and sosofos are. It isn't part of their semantics > that they are. I meant: "In DSSSL, basically only nodelists (and sosofos?) are defined such that their implementations can be lazy" but I got lazy. For instance I would be surprised if an implementation of node-list->list resulted in a lazily-created Scheme list. Am I being overly pessimistic? Would the original DSSSL (before we may or may not add side effects) permit lazy creation of Scheme lists? Paul Prescod DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Lazy Evaluation, James Clark | Thread | Re: Lazy Evaluation, Joe English |
Re: process specification elements, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: process specification elements, Matthias Clasen |
Month |