Subject: Re: SGML to HTML with jade? From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 10:11:29 -0400 |
Norman Walsh wrote: > That's definitely an issue. I needed modularity so that I could redefine > some definitions for specific projects without having to copy the whole > stylesheet. However, it's pretty clear that I don't fully grok the > ramifications of multiple style-specifications, and perhaps I went to > far in my zeal for modularity. I could merge things back together into > fewer pieces, certainly. You grok the semantics of standard SGML entities. Why don't you use those? Paul Prescod DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SGML to HTML with jade?, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | More thoughts on multiple style spe, Norman Walsh |
Re: Docbook stylesheet 0.83 and 0.8, Frank Christoph | Date | Re: use of Jade TeX backend?, Paul Prescod |
Month |