Re: Real numbers

Subject: Re: Real numbers
From: Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Aug 1997 11:40:02 +0100
>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

 Tony> I still don't know DSSSL's (or Scheme's) definition of a real
 Tony> number

For Scheme, see <URL:http://ftp-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~jaffer/r4rs_8.html#SEC50>.

 Tony> I can't think of an argument that would return different values
 Tony> for real? and number?

Right.  The only thing between `number' and `real' in the Scheme
numerical tower is `complex', so `number?' and `real?' should be
equivalent in a system which doesn't support complex numbers.

 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread
  • Real numbers
    • Tony Graham - Tue, 12 Aug 1997 14:39:01 -0400 (EDT)
      • Dave Love - Wed, 13 Aug 1997 15:17:11 -0400 (EDT)
        • Tony Graham - Wed, 13 Aug 1997 15:53:21 -0400 (EDT)
          • Dave Love - Fri, 15 Aug 1997 06:36:34 -0400 (EDT) <=