Subject: Re: Real numbers From: Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxx> Date: 15 Aug 1997 11:40:02 +0100 |
>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Tony> I still don't know DSSSL's (or Scheme's) definition of a real Tony> number For Scheme, see <URL:http://ftp-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~jaffer/r4rs_8.html#SEC50>. Tony> I can't think of an argument that would return different values Tony> for real? and number? Right. The only thing between `number' and `real' in the Scheme numerical tower is `complex', so `number?' and `real?' should be equivalent in a system which doesn't support complex numbers. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Real numbers, Tony Graham | Thread | leader flow objects and spread?, Lassi A. Tuura |
Re: Proposal: (node ...) constructi, Lassi A. Tuura | Date | testing the dsss list, Aliza R. Panitz |
Month |