RE: XSL and DSSSL-O

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: XSL and DSSSL-O

Subject: RE: XSL and DSSSL-O
From: christo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Frank Christoph)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 10:51:13 +0900

> > XSL seems to serve many of the purposes of DSSSL-O; what does it mean
> > for the future of DSSSL-O?
> 
> If DSSSL is revised to be a superset of XSL (as I will be encouraging
> Australia to support) then I would see XSL as being, in essence, DSSSL-O.

By revising DSSSL "to be a superset of XSL", you mean for example that you want
to have the syntax changed from Scheme-like notation to regular old SGML tagged
content?

--FC

 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist

Current Thread
XSL and DSSSL-O DuCharme, Robert - Fri, 12 Sep 1997 09:41:49 -0400 (EDT) <Possible follow-ups> Jon Bosak - Sat, 13 Sep 1997 18:37:09 -0400 (EDT) James K. Tauber - Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:43:36 -0400 (EDT) Frank Christoph - Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:43:17 -0400 (EDT) <= James K. Tauber - Tue, 16 Sep 1997 07:23:43 -0400 (EDT)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: XSL and DSSSL-O, James K. Tauber	Thread	RE: XSL and DSSSL-O, James K. Tauber
RE: Edition SGML-aware in Microsoft, Jacques Deseyne	Date	Re: Edition SGML-aware in Microsoft, Jose Carlos Ramalho
	Month