Subject: Re: Typo in DSSSL standard for (ancestors) function description From: Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxx> Date: 17 Oct 1997 15:36:20 +0100 |
>>>>> "Ken" == G Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Ken> For those who have not needed to do this before, functions not Ken> implemented in JADE can be implemented in your DSSSL programs by Ken> copying excerpts directly from the DSSSL standard (unless, of Ken> course, they have typos!). ... assuming also they use primitives which Jade supplies. For instance originally there wasn't a way to implement most of the node-list stuff because you didn't have `node-list' (even if you could hack `empty-node-list'). Now Jade has the constructors, but you'll have to implement `node-list-reduce' to be able to copy various of the functions in the standard; I think there's a list-based `reduce' given whose modification is trivial. [There's presumably an assumption that a reduce operation will be primitive because most interesting list functions can be done with it.] DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Typo in DSSSL standard, James Clark | Thread | Re: Typo in DSSSL standard for (anc, Dave Love |
Re: Typo in DSSSL standard, Chris Maden | Date | Re: DSSSL capabilities - was RE: TO, Chris Maden |
Month |