Subject: Re: Another scheme/dsssl question From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 16:25:41 -0500 |
[Norm Walsh] > Is it possible to test for the existance of a definition? > > Suppose I want to make it possible for a derived stylesheet to > override a value. I'd like to write something like this: > > (define default-foo '("x" "y" "z")) > ... > (if (some-predicate? foo) > foo > default-foo) > > Is that possible? You can test for procedure-ness with (procedure?). It's not clear from 8.5.10.1 that this will *only* return #t for things actually (define)d, since the Standard defines data types in terms of predicates that return #t for them, but it's worth a shot. -Chris -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Another scheme/dsssl question, Norman Walsh | Thread | Re: Another scheme/dsssl question, Norman Walsh |
Re: scheme/dsssl question, Chris Maden | Date | Re: Another scheme/dsssl question, Norman Walsh |
Month |