Re: Some XSL Questions

[Paul Grosso <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 19:45 1997 12 29 -0500, DSSSList Owner wrote:
>Happily, I was wrong to read too much into Jon's much earlier
>statement about XSL and the XML mailing list.  Jon has clarified it
>for me today as "...the XML SIG was at that time (and still is until
>an XSL WG is formed) the most appropriate place to hold such
>discussions within the W3C."
>
>I had previously posted about future XSL discussion on the DSSSList,
>working on the assumption that it wasn't currently "proper" to do it
>anywhere other than the XML list, but I have been too cautious.  The
>future is now, the XSL spec is publicly available, and the DSSSList is
                    ^^^^^^^^
>open for public discussion of XSL.

There is no XSL spec.  The only XSL document that exists (publicly or 
otherwise) is the submission made last August and acknowledged by the W3C
staff last September:
	<http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XSL-970910>
As a submission, it is only a partial starting point, and detailed discussion 
of it is of very questionable utility (and I suspect most of the authors of 
the submission will not find it well worth their time to reply).  The most 
appropriate kinds of discussion would be on user requirements, design goals, 
and general approach.  

paul


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist