Subject: Re: XSL Question From: Paul Grosso <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 11:23:55 -0500 |
At 04:09 1998 01 20 -0500, Jeremie Miller wrote: >I've just started writing a simple JavaScript based XSL >arser( http://www.jeremie.com/xparse/xsl/ ), and only have one question so >far. It seems like it would be so much easier to read, write, process, and >understand basic XSL rules if there was a clear definition between the >pattern and the action, like: > ><rule> > <pattern> > <target-element type="special"/> > </pattern> > <action> > <DIV font-weight="bold"> > <children/> > </DIV> > </action> ></rule> We omitted these "wrapper" tags because some of us were concerned about keeping the size of things to a minimum. Others of us, in fact, would prefer to add the wrappers as you suggest (I am in this latter camp myself). This issue is on the open issues list. Thanks for your input. paul DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL Question, Jeremie Miller | Thread | Accessing "types" from SGML Doc, Chuck Darney |
Re: Accessing "types" from SGML Doc, Norman Walsh | Date | DSSSL/XSL Training Course in Februa, G. Ken Holman |
Month |