Subject: Re: Border resolution question From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 20:19:01 +0700 |
Kathleen Marszalek wrote: > > Is the following FOT valid?: > > <table> > <table.before-column-border border-present="true"/> > ... > <table-cell column-number="1" ...> > <table-cell.before-column-border border-present="false"/> > ... > > The DSSSL specification states that: > > "border-priority: is an integer that determines how conflicts between > border specifications are resolved. When there are two table-border flow > objects that apply to a particular segment of a border, then the one that > has the larger priority shall be used. It shall be an error if there are two > such table-borders that have the same priority but are not identical. " > > Now, in the above example there are two border flow objects applied to the > same border segment, they have same prority, and ... are they different > because they differ by the characteristic of "border-present", or are they > identical but one is missing and the other not? How to interpret the > standard? >From the proposed TC (http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/wg8/document/1883.htm): > 12.6.27.7 > If there are conflicting borders of equal priority one from a table-border and one from a cell-border, the one from > the table-border should win. James DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Border resolution question, Kathleen Marszalek | Thread | Re: Border resolution question, Kathleen Marszalek |
Border resolution question, Kathleen Marszalek | Date | Re: Architectural Forms, separation, W. Eliot Kimber |
Month |