Subject: Re: speaking of spaces and formatting.... From: apharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Adam P. Harris) Date: 25 Aug 1998 12:17:10 -0400 |
Norman Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > / Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> was heard to say: > | Adam P. Harris wrote: > | > Do I really have to make sure that text follows > | > <para> tags without any space? > | > | The parsing is correct. That space is really part of the data of your > | document (unlike some other spaces, in other contexts). You can remove it > | in a DSSSL spec by using process-children-trim instead of > | process-children. You can debate with other users of the DocBook > Ah, yes. Thanks, Paul. I forgot it was that easy. Ok, so I > went back through the changelogs looking for when I removed > process-children-trim and found: > > Replaced all the occurances of (process-children-trim) with > (process-children) in inlines (I suspect this is needed > elsewhere too). Consider: "this <emphasis>is </emphasis>a > test". > > But now I think that paragraphs _ought_ to use process-children-trim. > Any disagreement? Not from me! .....A. P. Harris...apharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: speaking of spaces and formatti, Norman Walsh | Thread | Re: speaking of spaces and formatti, Norman Walsh |
Re: speaking of spaces and formatti, Norman Walsh | Date | Re: speaking of spaces and formatti, Adam P. Harris |
Month |