Subject: RE: Jade Backends (from The DSSSList Digest V2 #120) From: "Frank A. Christoph" <christo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 16:06:24 +0900 |
> I personnally would rather for PS first, since PDF is so easy to get after > (either with GhostScript or the Adobe Distiller), whereas i can't think of > anything that translates PDF into PS. Adobe Acrobat translates PDF into PS. You can even do it in batch mode from the command line. Any PDF viewer which allows you to print the document can be used to convert to PS. If there is a "print to file" option (and there always is), you can use that; otherwise, you could still set up a custom spooler that would save the stream to a file. Unless you have a very unusual page to layout (like say, one of those PostScript demonstrations that draws a fractal procedurally), PDF->PS is the way to go, not the other way around. The reason is that a PDF file has much more internal structure than a PS file; you can represent complicated page structures, embed invisible structural tags in the output, search it, add annotations to the text, update the file incrementally in terms of its object structure, linearize it for incremental display (as in web downloading), embed interactive elements and internal or external hyperlinks, etc., etc. All things that are difficult, impossible or unavailable with a normal PostScript file, but fit in naturally with the structural text paradigm of SGML. --FC DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Jade Backends (from The DSSSLis, Adam P. Harris | Thread | Re: Jade Backends (from The DSSSLis, David Megginson |
Re: PostScript?, Jean-Baptiste Nivoit | Date | AW: PostScript?, Dr. Markus Hönicka |
Month |