Subject: Re: PostScript? From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 15:15:15 +0800 |
-----Original Message----- From: David Megginson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >To do this well would take much work -- TeX produces >publishing-quality output because is the result of two decades of >development and refinement. Unless you plan to embed TeX's >composition engine into a Postscript/PDF backend, it is unlikely that >you will have the time or resources to manage better than, say, >Netscape's "Save As" Postscript output. I'm doing it for FOP, my flow/formatting object to PDF converter, but it's really just for the love of it (and a project in which to learn Python). I plan to eventually use TeX-like algorithms for most of the formatting. James -- James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.jtauber.com/ Lecturer and Associate Researcher Electronic Commerce Network ( http://www.xmlinfo.com/ Curtin Business School ( http://www.xmlsoftware.com/ Perth, Western Australia ( http://www.schema.net/ DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: PostScript?, David Megginson | Thread | nbsp in Jade, Pawson, David |
Re: XSL support in Jade, James Clark | Date | Re: XSL support in Jade, James Tauber |
Month |