Subject: Re: Processing Siblings As Though They Were Children From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 08:50:37 -0500 |
At 07:36 PM 10/22/98 -0400, Chris Maden wrote: >(element containter1 > (make element > gi: "level-1-container")) > >(element SubHead > (make element > gi: "level-2-container" > (make element > gi: "level-2-title" > (process-children)) > (process-node-list (node-list-filter ...[1])))) > >[1] is, of course, the interesting bit, but I have to go. I would >iterate (probably in a procedure) over the following siblings, consing >elements until I hit another SubHead or ran out of siblings. Right, I can loop over the node list and quit when I hit the next subhead, but how do leave the context of the level-2-container and then have the higher-level process (the process-children of container1) take up where I've left off and not take up with the sibling following the SubHead, which is where I would expect it to resume, as the subordinate process-node-list won't, as far as I know, affect the process-children processing. Thanks, E. -- <Address HyTime=bibloc> W. Eliot Kimber, Senior Consulting SGML Engineer ISOGEN International Corp. 2200 N. Lamar St., Suite 230, Dallas, TX 75202. 214.953.0004 www.isogen.com </Address> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Processing Siblings As Though T, Chris Maden | Thread | Re: Processing Siblings As Though T, Chris Maden |
Re: question about spacing around n, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: Processing Siblings As Though T, Chris Maden |
Month |