Subject: Re: Finding the root element From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 11:36:33 -0600 |
At 10:17 AM 10/30/98 +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote: >"W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> How could root rules be useful if you didn't have the grove root available? >> If the standard as published doesn't provide for it, then the standard is >> broken and needs to be fixed. > >I think Norm never mentioned the key point here: The DSSSL standard >provides (current-root), which clearly would provide the needed node >within (root ...) or elsewhere. It happens that Jade doesn't >include this procedure in the subset of DSSSL it implements, hence >Norm's problem. Ah. Still, I think it is logical that current-node should be the grove root in a root rule. Cheers, E. -- <Address HyTime=bibloc> W. Eliot Kimber, Senior Consulting SGML Engineer ISOGEN International Corp. 2200 N. Lamar St., Suite 230, Dallas, TX 75202. 214.953.0004 www.isogen.com </Address> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Finding the root element, Henry S. Thompson | Thread | Re: Finding the root element, Norman Walsh |
Re: PI for page break?, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | RE: Finding the root element, Reynolds, Gregg |
Month |