Subject: Re: is there a future for the DSSSL standard? (one testimonial) From: "Wilson, James.W" <James.W.Wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 07:46:58 -0600 |
> -----Original Message----- > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 23:24:00 -0500 (EST) > From: Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: is there a future for the DSSSL standard? > > At 13 Nov 1998 17:17 +0100, Bas Peters wrote: > > We are planning to implement a formatting routine for bibliographic > > records and high on my priority list is Jade and DSSSL. I have been > > prototyping a bit and it works fine, but before investing more time and > > money, I was wondering: is there a future for the DSSSL standard. Until > > now it is very difficult to collect information about using the > > standard. I have the idea that the DocBook style-sheets are succesfull, > > but that not much people are creating style-sheets for other DTD's. in our company (a very large legal publisher) we have very successfully used Jade and DSSSL as the basis for a system converting legal forms in sgml into RTF. These are the main selling points of our 'forms' cds, which sell for thousands of dollars. We process about one gig of data every month, and this system has been extremely stable. The one bug which I found in Jade itself was fixed promptly - I think it took Sri Clark less than a day to get back to me with the patch. Our (600k) dtd is pretty specialized, so we had to roll our own style sheet; it took me about two months of not-very-hard work (on my own, I might mention) to get things to a production-ready point, and I had never used DSSSL before. I give it my hearty endorsement. James Wilson DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: JADE and 'exotic' encodings., James Clark | Thread | Time for Jade to process SUBDOCs, Chuck Darney |
Re: JADE and 'exotic' encodings., James Clark | Date | Time for Jade to process SUBDOCs, Chuck Darney |
Month |