Subject: Re: DSSSL future From: J-P Theberge <yesod@xxxxxxx> Date: 18 Feb 1999 15:46:11 -0500 |
"Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > What is your opinion on the following topics: > > a) Do you think that dsssl could be a good language for SGML/XML server side > transform? I'll explain. Imagine that when a browser call for a SGML/XML I'm already using jade + Apache for "on the fly" conversion. It is fine on the Intranet but I havent yet try it on the Internet. > > b) Do you think that the previous mechanism should include also the capacity > to select a style sheet based on who connect (i.e. the person, the browser, > the calling location)? yes. A (getenv) function in Dsssl also can be great. > > c) Do you think that a server transformation solution is better than a > client based solution (like you would find in the SGML/XML kit or Hybrick)? yes > > e) To do a server side transform is a total waste of time? > no. -- JP Theberge yesod@xxxxxxxxxxx DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
DSSSL future, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: DSSSL future, Didier PH Martin |
RE: DSSSL future, Liam R. E. Quin | Date | RE: DSSSL future, Didier PH Martin |
Month |