Subject: RE: grouping elements From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:56:12 -0500 |
Hi Bas I you use the SGML/XML kit, which is using james extension proposals you can write your style sheet like as below: (or-element (MRCB100-c MRCB100-d MRCB100-e) (make sequence (literal " ") (process-children) ) ) This extension has been created to resolve the problem of having more than one element with the same rule.Notice that the rule begins with "or-element" instead of "element". An or-element construction rule has the syntax (or-element (pattern+) expression) where pattern is any pattern that could be allowed in an element construction rule. It is equivalent to a sequence of element construction rule Regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bas Peters Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 5:24 AM To: 'dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: grouping elements I have a stylesheet for database records that includes the following rules: (element MRCB100-c (make sequence (literal " ") (process-children) ) ) (element MRCB100-d (make sequence (literal " ") (process-children) ) ) (element MRCB100-e (make sequence (literal " ") (process-children) ) ) Is there a way to group the elements in one rule that repeates the literal statement for all elements and not for one element? > Bas Peters > E-mail: bpeters@xxxxxx > > DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: grouping elements, Tony Graham | Thread | RE: grouping elements, STE MARIE, PAUL |
Re: grouping elements, Tony Graham | Date | RE: Postioning Graphics side by sid, Didier PH Martin |
Month |