Subject: RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF? From: Avi Kivity <Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:22:09 +0200 |
On Thursday, March 04, 1999 22:58, Didier PH Martin [SMTP:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > Do you think that a PDF backend for a DSSSL engine is something that > can be > useful? To be more precise, having PDF output from a DSSSL script > processing. A tightly coupled 'mid-end', or formatter, is highly desirable, to support non-simple page-sequences and generated flow objects. Various back ends (pdf, postscript, X, win32 gdi) should be easy to attach to the formatter since they implement essentially the same model. Once you get to the page description level the format no longer affects output quality (correct me if I am wrong), so the format should not matter. There are near-lossless converters for the formats specified above. --- "The only words which have meaning are the last ones spoken" DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Horst Kucharczyk | Thread | RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Didier PH Martin |
RE: Problems with grafics and RTF, Avi Kivity | Date | Re: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Mike Sosteric |
Month |