Subject: RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF? From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 09:56:35 -0500 |
Hi David Thank you for your feedback. You said that page-sequence and friend are two useful features to have, I take note of this. Regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David Carlisle Sent: Thursday, March 04, 1999 8:35 PM To: dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF? what would be useful would be a tightly coupled formater that allowed page-sequence and friends. If it was `just' a back end that made pdf, it is not clear that this would follow: > (for example: the time gained by not having to process the document > through several tools). If it does save time it is of course useful. But not if it does it by not taking as much care over the formatting as TeX. So probably the answer to your `would it be useful' question is yes, but it might be no, I can't be sure from the amount of information given:-) David DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Horst Kucharczyk |
Re: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | DSSSL style sheet for the XML spec , Stefan Mintert |
Month |