Subject: The simple-page-sequence FO vs the page-sequence FO - Possible implementation in PDF. From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 17:48:14 -0500 |
Hi, I just read the specs and a simple-page-sequence is a lot more easier to implement than a page-sequence object. In fact, the main difference is that a simple-sequence-object has a less features than a page-sequence object. The main difference between these two page models is that all with the simple-page-sequence model all pages are the same. With the page-sequence model pages could be with different characteristics. For example the first page of a document could be with different settings than the other pages. So a) simple-page-sequence is easy to implement - all pages are the same b) page sequence needs more work because pages could be different. I think that both page models could be easily implemented in PDF which encompass both page models. Regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Jadetex overflow, VKuznetsov | Thread | RE: The simple-page-sequence FO vs , Avi Kivity |
RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Didier PH Martin | Date | RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Avi Kivity |
Month |