Subject: Re: RE: About the article From: "P. Stritzi" <e6g1m6n3@xxxxxx> Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 20:05:34 +0200 (MEST) |
Didier PH Martin writes: > you spoke about free platform <question>Is it Linux?</question>. if yes, > then, if you call it free, this is probably because you downloaded it and > compiled it (free) and did not bought the already compiled one (not free). Sorry to be picky but I think we have here a mixup of meanings for free. All Linux distributions are free in the sense of "Freedom" (to copy/modify source) because they are actually GNU systems with Linux Kernel and as such Copylefted. Free in this sense doesnt have to mean free of cost. So lets widen the scope of this discussion to Open Source where this misunderstanding doesnt lurk. > We would be glad to get some help from people able to recompile the Linux OS > (free) because actually a lot of them have Linux pre-packaged (not free). Why do you have to recompile Linux? What part do you need to change? The kernel? The libs? BTW it should be possible to recompile the pre-packaged Linuxes because the have to contain the sources (mandated by copyleft). Greetings Peer Stritzinger --- Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: About the article, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: RE: About the article, Didier PH Martin |
Better/Faster method to find the ne, P. Stritzi | Date | Re: To James - The DSSSL bazaar and, Adam Di Carlo |
Month |