Subject: Re: About the source library From: Ron Ross <ronross@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 22:04:26 -0400 (EDT) |
On Thu, 6 May 1999, Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Thursday, May 06, 1999 10:22 AM, Ron Ross [SMTP:ronross@xxxxxxxxx] > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 6 May 1999, I wrote: >> > Going on-screen means there no longer is a file format. The FOT, >> > instead >> > of being translated into text or binary byte strings, is >> > translated into >> > the native API of whatever is doing the display. The ability to >> > change >> > window width dynamically also affects rendering. >> >> Phew! I believe this goes some way toward explaining another >> poster's > > Me. A web search shows it's "Scalable Vector Graphics". But I don't > really get what you're driving at. I thought from what you described that SVG, in the current discussion, related to outputting directly to the display. (but don't mind me, I'm a complete neophyte; and sorry, I was too quick in deleting messages and couldn't remember who had asked about SVG). > Maybe you can provide multiple versions: editable RTF, webbable > HTML, and printable output from the TeX backend or the native > formatter (when there is one). After all, that's what those multiple > backends are there for. Precisely what I meant (after clearing up what the native formatter might involve). Not a bad choice either;-). rr . DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: About the source library, Avi Kivity | Thread | RE: About the source library, John McClure |
RE: indentation (was Re: About the , Frank A. Christoph | Date | Re: indentation (was Re: About the , Brandon Ibach |
Month |