Subject: RE: indentation (was Re: About the article) From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 11:33:18 +0100 |
Brandon Ibach wrote: My point in this is that you may not want to go too far to >draw someone in to DSSSL if they wouldn't be willing to invest the >time to really learn how to use it properly. As someone who went through this some time back (about 18 months ago), I was drawn into it via some very simple examples, then Paul P's great intro. I started to delve deeper, and went downhill fast learning scheme, reading the spec, anything else etc. Thats where I had to decide on the investment. Fortunately, I found the investment sufficiently rewarding, fairly quickly. (Anything less than scheme I now find a bit 'dirty' :-) My point is that the first couple of sessions with DSSSL were very rewarding, and were enough to get me hooked. It might work for others? A simplepage sequence, a few make paragraphs etc and hey presto I had RTF output. Instant gratification. That could be used as the 'bait' in a selling exercise? HTH DaveP DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: indentation (was Re: About the , Brandon Ibach | Thread | Bait (was RE: indentation), Simon North |
RE: About the source library, John McClure | Date | Re: Question concerning speedup of , Peter Nilsson |
Month |