Subject: Re: Jade/DSSSL future From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 17:58:28 +0700 |
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > James Clark writes: > > > > There's not much point in implementing full page-sequence flow object in > > the front-end unless it can be supported in the back-ends. None of the > > existing backends could support the complex-page-sequence. What's > I would agree, but there is an intermediate gray area. TeX, for > instance, can clearly do far more than the DSSSSL subset in Jade > allows for, but cannot do the theoretical full page sequence > stuff. how do we realistically harness the rich intermediate level? This is a defect in the design of DSSSL. The lesson has been learnt and the XSL 1.0 is providing a level of functionality less than the full generality of the DSSSL page-sequence but much more than the DSSSL simple-page-sequence. James DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Jade/DSSSL future, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: Jade/DSSSL future, Brandon Ibach |
Re: Jade/DSSSL future, Brandon Ibach | Date | RE: Jade/DSSSL future, Frank A. Christoph |
Month |