Subject: RE: Jade/DSSSL future From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 15:47:27 -0400 |
Hi Sebastian, You are right. If we have volonteers for XSLFO, this will be included. But we are still waiting :-) regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz Sent: Saturday, May 29, 1999 3:18 PM To: dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Jade/DSSSL future Didier PH Martin writes: > Hi Sebastian, > > I cannot speak for Explorer (Microsoft IE) but for Mozilla the probability > of having XSLT before the end of the year is very high. We are working on > this. The probability to have XSLFO is very very low. We are not working on > it. This is too much work to reconcile CSS objects and XSLFO objects. > Because XSLT can manipulate CSS object. We don't put any effort on XSLFO. but then again you have a Mozilla contributory group working on a MathML renderer; unless you would actually *refuse* volunteers who wanted to implement XSLFO, it may still happen Sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Jade/DSSSL future, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: Jade/DSSSL future, James Tauber |
RE: Jade/DSSSL future, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | XSLT syntax, Daniel Mahler |
Month |