Subject: Re: More on the Future of DSSSL From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 14:45:54 -0400 |
Didier Martin wrote: > >Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 08:16:49 -0400 >From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: More on the Future of DSSSL > >Hi Ralph, > >I agree with most of your points. > >May I do a suggestion? If Hybrick would be also packaged as a component like >for instance a DCOM component or a XPCOM component, it could be even easier >to integrate it into all kind of product. If you think this is possible, I >will be the first interested to use it and incorporate it into other product >able to accept components. If some cooperation is welcomed, write to me, we >can further discuss this. If we all cooperate, DSSSL can survive. The next release of HyBrick will be as a plug-in, including support for proxy servers - a key feature we've been missing. While I can't give an exact release date yet, this work is well advanced. By making HyBrick a plug-in, we're providing a way around the absence of Form support in DSSSL. We could have added our own custom flow-objects to handle Forms and this might prove useful in the future. In fact, "Dynamic DSSSL" could be a whole new area for discussion. Right now though, we want to explore the possibilities made available by launching HyBrick from an HTML page. They should be considerable. Best regards, Ralph E. Ferris HyBrick Project Manager Fujitsu Software Corporation DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: More on the Future of DSSSL, Didier PH Martin | Thread | jade from browser, Annegret Fiebig |
RE: ..., Didier PH Martin | Date | Re: ..., Jack Fitzpatrick |
Month |