Subject: RE: SGML entity mgmt stds (was Re: ISUG and DSSSL) From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 15:22:08 -0400 |
Hi Adam, Adam said: I would like to point all SGML/DSSSL authors to the guidelines published at <URL:http://www.sgmltools.org/docs/sgml-dir-standard/t01.html>, namely the "SGML on Unix Directory Hierarchy Standard". Didier says: I do not have the same structure as specified in this document but I do not see any problem to adapt to it. It seems that the proposed structure is: SGML |__ DTD |__ entity |__ Stylesheet |__ misc I would have only one reserve about the "stylesheet" directory. I would call that "scripts" instead because it may be also other thing than strict stylesheet scripts. This last directory can contain script to do transformation or other kind of XML/SGML processing. So, in this case I rather see this dir renamed "scripts" instead of "stylesheet". Other wise the rest makes sense. And like I said, I am ready to modify the SGML/XML kit to reflect that structure. What about a "library" section in addition to the one listed above. The library section could contain all lib scripts (like for instance the Mulberry lib). The referred document do not have a dir for catalogs. this seems to be an omission. My suggestion would be to have this structure (includes the one from the referred doc) SGML |__ DTD |__ catalog |__ entity |__ scripts |__ misc. What do you think? Ralph, your comments. Would it be difficult on your side to modify your dir structure? What do you suggest? regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
SGML entity mgmt stds (was Re: ISUG, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | Re: SGML entity mgmt stds (was Re: , Cees de Groot |
RE: DSSSL Procedure Library -- no c, Didier PH Martin | Date | Re: Generating high-level formattin, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |