Subject: Re: SGML entity mgmt stds (was Re: ISUG and DSSSL) From: Cees de Groot <cg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:13:06 +0200 |
>How to keep two versions of docbook in DTD directory? >E.g. 3.0 SGML and the XML one? I have .../sgml/dtd/docbook/3.0, 3.1, ... >Suggest DTD's be placed on an owner basis, so that >we see such as OASIS and DAVENPORT. > That's another way to store documents that are locatable by pubids, indeed (I'd do: .../sgml/pubid/oasis/...). It could even be a neat way to automate catalogueing... >and how about a bin for jade & xt? > Under Unix, .../share (the parent of .../share/sgml) only contains system-independent files ("shared" between multiple architectures). User-executable binaries are kept together in .../bin, with the implicit assumption that some OS-level magic may be going on in order to provide the correct binaries for the platform you're working on. >Same logic would apply within stylesheets / scripts. >How to seperate XSL from DSSSL, for those who >work with both? > stylesheet/docbook-xsl, or stylesheet/xsl/docbook, whatever. Of course one of the hardest parts of a standard like this is whether to standardize anything at all - what would the benefits be? If there are no clear benefits, don't standardize it, is my opinion. -- Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <cg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: SGML entity mgmt stds (was Re: , DPawson | Thread | Re: SGML entity mgmt stds (was Re: , Karl Eichwalder |
Re: your mail, Cees de Groot | Date | Re: SGML entity mgmt stds (was Re: , Cees de Groot |
Month |