Subject: RE: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. length-specs From: "Frank A. Christoph" <christo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 15:08:45 +0900 |
I'm not sure there is a bug here. 12.5.2 seems to say that + and - are only overloaded for length-specs when every argument is a length-spec. It looks to me like you are trying to elide that check. (I lost the original message but, as I recall, this started because someone complained because + didn't work as expected when applied to a length-spec and a non-length spec.) --FC > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Matthias Clasen > Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 7:04 AM > To: dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. length-specs > > > > Here is a fix for this recently discovered jade bug: > I have added this to my jade patches collection in > > ftp://peano.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de/pub/jade/ ... DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. lengt, Matthias Clasen | Thread | Re: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. l, Brandon Ibach |
Re: SGML entity mgmt stds, Adam Di Carlo | Date | Re: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. l, Brandon Ibach |
Month |