RE: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. length-specs

Subject: RE: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. length-specs
From: "Frank A. Christoph" <christo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 15:08:45 +0900
I'm not sure there is a bug here. 12.5.2 seems to say that + and - are only
overloaded for length-specs when every argument is a length-spec. It looks
to me like you are trying to elide that check. (I lost the original message
but, as I recall, this started because someone complained because + didn't
work as expected when applied to a length-spec and a non-length spec.)

--FC

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Matthias Clasen
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 7:04 AM
> To: dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. length-specs
>
>
>
> Here is a fix for this recently discovered jade bug:
> I have added this to my jade patches collection in
>
> ftp://peano.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de/pub/jade/
...


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread