Subject: RE: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. length-specs From: "Frank A. Christoph" <christo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 16:56:57 +0900 |
> On the contrary, the standard is quite clear. The description of > the basic arithmetic operators from 12.5.2 is: > > These procedures behave in the same way as their counterparts on > quantities, except that they shall return a length-spec if any <--- > of their arguments is a length-spec (as opposed to just a length). You're right; I was looking at the signatures above that paragraph. The ones for + and - are not consistent with this description. --FC DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. l, Brandon Ibach | Thread | Re: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. l, Matthias Clasen |
Re: [OpenJade] Bugfix for +/- vs. l, Brandon Ibach | Date | Re: Generating high-level formattin, Norman Gray |
Month |