RE: About the declare-flow-object-class

Subject: RE: About the declare-flow-object-class
From: "Frank A. Christoph" <christo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 09:00:06 +0900
> There are many places in the standard where things which are left
> undefined or implementation-defined can be specified further via
> a pubid; hyphenation-methods, line-breaking-methods,
> line-composition-methods
> come to mind.

I agree wholeheartedly. It's a shame that DSSSL is so poorly specified when
Scheme set such a wonderful example of rigor.

> By the way, can anybody explain the difference between line-breaking
> and line-composition to me ?

I asked the same question on this list about a year ago, and there was no
reply. It's a DSSSL mystery. Maybe the designers themselves had no clue...?

--FC


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread