RE: About Constructions rules

[Avi Kivity <Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday, July 16, 1999 00:53, Avi Kivity [SMTP:Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> On Friday, July 16, 1999 00:18, Matthias Clasen
> [SMTP:clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> > 
> > The list of nodes which match the query has to be constructed only once,
> > but you have to decide for every node you process if it is on the list.
> > But there might be ways to make this cheaper: One idea would be to
> > associate
> > the list of matching query rules directly to the node once it is
> > constructed.
> > When processing a node, you would then first check if it has matching
> > query rules attached. If yes, you use the most specific one, otherwise
> > find the applicable rule as before.
> >  
> I will say it until one of us convinces the other: dsssl *never* processes
> or examines the entire tree.
> 
Upon re-reading, we seem to be saying the same thing.

---
"The only words which have meaning are the last ones spoken"



 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist