RE: About Constructions rules

Subject: RE: About Constructions rules
From: Avi Kivity <Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 14:53:20 +0300
On Friday, July 16, 1999 02:50, Matthias Clasen
[SMTP:clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> 
> Not entirely. Currently jade does not only avoid to create grove nodes
> for individual characters, but also to construct individual character FOs
> - instead it pumps out whole chunks of chars directly to the backend.
> As you said this is possible because rules for character nodes 
> are fixed. But this is no longer true if query rules are used. Thus
> we have to change jade to avoid this shortcut if there are query rules
> which do override the rules for char nodes. But this can - in principle -
> be checked in advance, once the query-style-expressions have been 
> evaluated.
> 
I have thought about this, and I'm itching to implement it, but I'm even
more itching to implement other things.

---
"The only words which have meaning are the last ones spoken"



 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread