Subject: RE: About Constructions rules From: Avi Kivity <Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 14:53:20 +0300 |
On Friday, July 16, 1999 02:50, Matthias Clasen [SMTP:clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > > Not entirely. Currently jade does not only avoid to create grove nodes > for individual characters, but also to construct individual character FOs > - instead it pumps out whole chunks of chars directly to the backend. > As you said this is possible because rules for character nodes > are fixed. But this is no longer true if query rules are used. Thus > we have to change jade to avoid this shortcut if there are query rules > which do override the rules for char nodes. But this can - in principle - > be checked in advance, once the query-style-expressions have been > evaluated. > I have thought about this, and I'm itching to implement it, but I'm even more itching to implement other things. --- "The only words which have meaning are the last ones spoken" DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: About Constructions rules, Avi Kivity | Thread | RE: About Constructions rules, Avi Kivity |
Re: Copy a SGML structure and datas, Holger Klawitter | Date | RE: About Constructions rules, Avi Kivity |
Month |