Subject: Re: About Constructions rules From: Matthias Clasen <clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 10:31:32 +0200 |
> > Interesting. I just experimentally added a one-liner to configure.in > to look for libpthread and if found, enable SP_USE_PTHREADS. I'm > testing this out now. I guess we might want to think about (for Nice, I thought about that myself, but didn't do it. > OpenJade) whether we want to in fact *assume* threading is desired if > available (which is the the current assumption for Win32 and MACH), > and, if so, whether we need to allow a configure switch to disable > it... I think the default should be to not enable MT, but that's just my opinion. > I'd be happy to patch configure.in to suit for OpenJade. Let me know > how the defaulting should work. > > BTW, Matthias, I don't know if we're enabling the MIF and HTML > backends by default in configure.in... don't we need to change this > to match the Win32 build? > The post-pre3 cvs already contains the necessary changes. I switched to using a nice m4 macro (smr_SWITCH) which creates --enable-xyz/--disable-xyz with a settable default. -- Matthias Clasen, Tel. 0761/203-5606 Email: clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mathematisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: About Constructions rules, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | RE: About Constructions rules, Frank A. Christoph |
Re: OpenJade and Debian, Matthias Clasen | Date | RE: Embedding graphics in RTF, Avi Kivity |
Month |