Subject: Re: sgml-parse and GC From: Brandon Ibach <bibach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 17:19:13 -0500 |
Quoting Avi Kivity <Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > [Regarding an on-disk grove implementation with memory mapped files] > What you would get is grove persistence over invocations of the style > engine, which may or may not be a win. > Of course, this would be dependent on how well it was managed. For instance, could we implement an effective "dependency" system, where OpenJade would track the modification times and reparse a document only when needed? Of course, the benefits of this would depend upon the application. An application that has a lot of reuse of largely static documents could probably benefit greatly. One that hardly ever reuses a document without it changing would not benefit much, if at all. I think it would be good to have, one way or another. -Brandon :) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: sgml-parse and GC, Avi Kivity | Thread | RE: sgml-parse and GC, Didier PH Martin |
RE: sgml-parse and GC, Avi Kivity | Date | Re: OpenJade and Debian, Matthias Clasen |
Month |