Subject: Re: emitting comments From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 22:27:43 +0100 (BST) |
> And a small advantage of dsssl over xsl is that you can derive a dtd > for your style-sheets from the dsssl architecture which uses cdata declared > content for the style-specification-body to avoid the whole problem. > xml doesn't allow that. Or is this impossible for some reason ? Yes, you can, but what has never really been clear to me was _why_ dsssl was defined as an sgml application rather than a lisp-ish one. I know that as defined some of the top level forms require SGML notation But would it have been impossible for those to have used lisp syntax too? What was the overriding reason for having dsssl as an sgml architecture at all? David DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: emitting comments, Matthias Clasen | Thread | Re: emitting comments, Carlos Villegas |
Re: emitting comments, Matthias Clasen | Date | RE: emitting comments, Frank A. Christoph |
Month |