Subject: RE: About multiple output documents from a single XML/SGML processed document From: Avi Kivity <Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:09:23 +0300 |
On Thursday, August 12, 1999 04:54, Didier PH Martin [SMTP:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > that a solution would be to add a new characteristic to the > simple-page-sequence and this new characteristic would be used to create a > new output file or, said differently, create a new flow object tree. Is > this > a viable solution? I would rather not extend the dsssl model any more than necessary, as this would probably involve modifying all backends and losing compatibility to other dsssl engines. The simple solution exists today: run Jade once per output file, with parametrized stylesheets. It could be optimized to use a single invocation of the program, so as to minimize the parsing necessary, but no more. Something like jade -d 'xform1.dsl | (style1.dsl; style2.dsl; (xform2.dsl | style3.dsl))' something.sgml with some way to name output files (this example produces three output files, two of them transformed once and styled once, and one file transformed twice and styled once). This is actually useful; I have a 10-pass stylesheet which produces around 5 output files in 3 different formats. Just looking at the makefile makes me dizzy. --- "The only words which have meaning are the last ones spoken" DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: About multiple output documents, DPawson | Thread | RE: About multiple output documents, Joerg Wittenberger |
RE: About multiple output documents, DPawson | Date | RE: About multiple output documents, Joerg Wittenberger |
Month |