Subject: Re: About OpenJade and Debian From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 16 Aug 1999 01:17:10 -0400 |
"Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks Adam for the precision. Is the Debian doc itself based on LinuxDoc or > Docbook? The question isn't really meaningful. Debian accepts documentation written in *whatever*. Our primary internal documentation format uses our own DTD and Perl/SGMLspm based SGML system (could be in DSSSL though!) called debiandoc, which is mostly linuxdoc v1 but with some additional tags for packages and such. However, Debian includes a complete SGML toolchain. I personally do most of my documentation in DocBook/SGML. I also have some custom XML DTDs and DocBook DSSSL/DTD extensions that I use for work. All this activity is well-supported in Debian, which includes system entity and catalog management capabilities. -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: About OpenJade and Debian, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: About OpenJade and Debian, Didier PH Martin |
Re: [Jade/OpenJade] g++ 2.95 C++ po, Carlos Villegas | Date | [PATCH] [Jade/OpenJade] g++ 2.95 C+, Adam Di Carlo |
Month |