|
Subject: RE: Interesting problem From: "Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor" <roconnor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:25:02 -0400 (EDT) |
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Didier PH Martin wrote:
> All solutions are good, but you are right, we need also solutions not based
> on the make "element". This is an OpenJade solution but not a standard DSSSL
> solution. Thanx Jeorg for your solution (but I am sure you have others in
> mind - just from your comment, I can sense that ;-)
If we don't use the make element construct then we would have to use the
DSSSL transformation language. I'd expect the solution to be very similar
to the Jade solution, but I'm not aware of any implementations of the
transformation language that I could test a solution on.
--
Russell O'Connor roconnor@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/~roconnor/>
``And truth irreversibly destroys the meaning of its own message''
-- Anindita Dutta, ``The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy''
DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Interesting problem, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: Interesting problem, Didier PH Martin |
| Re: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Matthias Clasen | Date | RE: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Avi Kivity |
| Month |