RE: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/OpenJade] g++ 2.95 C++ portabilit y problems

Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/OpenJade] g++ 2.95 C++ portabilit y problems
From: Peter Nilsson <pnidv96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:19:57 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Avi Kivity wrote:

> I'm no gcc expert, but looking at the docs I see a -frepo flag which seems
> to allow you to get rid of the _inst files completely. Surely that would be
> better? Or is there a catch?
> 
Shouldn't be needed if you include the definitions in every translation
unit.

Regards,
/Peter Nilsson

--
'(?P . (?e . (?t . (?e . (?r)))))


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread