Subject: Re: shlib naming (was Re: OpenJade 1.3pre1 (Beta) Released) From: Karl Eichwalder <ke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 23 Aug 1999 21:34:27 +0200 |
Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: | I must again strongly point out that we oughta to change the | shared library names in OpenJade so they don't conflict with Jade's. I like to second your wish (speaking for SuSE); for the near future I like to offer these packages at the same time. At least, please increase the version number of the libraries. (I already "complained" via private e-mail when I wrote an bug report on openjade 1.3pre1). | BTW, it could also be argued that we should rename our commands, | e.g., jade to openjade, nsgmls to opennsgmls, etc. Using autoconf/configure, it should be possible to choose the "prefix" via --program-prefix={o,open}. I've to admit, I didn't check whether this mechanism works for openjade. -- work : ke@xxxxxxx Karl Eichwalder private: ke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
shlib naming (was Re: OpenJade 1.3p, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | Re: shlib naming (was Re: OpenJade , Nik Clayton |
Re: About XML to multiple language/, Matthias Clasen | Date | RE: mode/with-mode, Didier PH Martin |
Month |