Subject: Re: SGML entity mgmt stds From: Mark Galassi <rosalia@xxxxxxxx> Date: 16 Sep 1999 09:01:10 -0600 |
>>>>> "Didier" == Didier PH Martin <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Didier> I can tell you than from the user point of view and Didier> depending on which feature you want to use, there is a Didier> difference between OpenJade and Jade. jade is dead Didier> organism and OpenJade a living body evolving each day. Of Didier> course, OpenJade is based on Jade's code base but the Didier> OpenJade branch is evolving, jade is not. Dear Didier, This is wonderful news. I knew that you guys were picking up the jade code (which would have eventually died without a really energetic effort like what you describe, just because of the James's excellent but idiosyncratic code), and from what you say it sounds like you are really going for it. What I meant about users is that most doc writers just run "db2html" (or whatever wrapper script). The next time I put out a package, I will certainly use the most recent OpenJade release. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: SGML entity mgmt stds, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Re: DAVENPORT: sgml2latex for docbo, Adam Di Carlo |
Re: The DSSSList Digest V3 #168, Norman Walsh | Date | Re: DAVENPORT: sgml2latex for docbo, Adam Di Carlo |
Month |