Subject: Re: DAVENPORT: sgml2latex for docbook? From: Peter Nilsson <pnidv96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:26:00 +0200 (CEST) |
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > better hack it in Jade's TeXFOTBuilder.cxx, to be honest, > in "TeXFOTBuilder::characters". My memory is declining with old age > --- didn't someone make this patch last year? I don't have a current > Jade source on this box > It isn't in the devel tree anyway. > I should say that the chances of my doing any real work on JadeTeX are > pretty remote. If Joerg, Mattthias or anyone wants to take over the > maintenance, I'd be more than happy to relinquish control. > I won't take it over:-) However, I think the best thing is to maintain the official version in the OpenJade development tree? Then, it is easy for me and others to hack on it there. Is it the latest version in the repository? If I get some time, I will go in the direction suggested by many on this list, against doing more in C++ (actually I like C++ as a programming language than TeX:-), outputting low-level TeX instead of the FOT representation. (I don't promise everything, it is just that sometimes I touch the backends, and then I could touch the TeX one as well if the official version is in CVS.) Regards, /Peter Nilsson > Sebastian > > > DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist > -- '(#\P . (#\e . (#\t . (#\e . (#\r))))) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: DAVENPORT: sgml2latex for docbo, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: DAVENPORT: sgml2latex for docbo, Sebastian Rahtz |
RE: (jade / openjade) : assertion f, Peter Nilsson | Date | Re: (jade / openjade) : assertion f, Thomas Andre Berger |
Month |