Re: Bug#45489: DAVENPORT: sgml2latex for docbook?

Subject: Re: Bug#45489: DAVENPORT: sgml2latex for docbook?
From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 22:55:26 +0100 (BST)
Adam Di Carlo writes:
 > 
 > Is the OpenJade group taking over maintenance of JadeTeX also
 > (currently shipped in contrib) ?
 > 
 > Sebastian seems eager to orphan it... any takers?

orphan it is a harsh phrase :-} I prefer phrases like "handing over
the baton".

to be truthful, I am simply being an XSL renegade, and concentrating
on PassiveTeX (the XSL FO equivalent of JadeTeX)

sebastian


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread