Subject: Re: Bug#45489: DAVENPORT: sgml2latex for docbook? From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 22:55:26 +0100 (BST) |
Adam Di Carlo writes: > > Is the OpenJade group taking over maintenance of JadeTeX also > (currently shipped in contrib) ? > > Sebastian seems eager to orphan it... any takers? orphan it is a harsh phrase :-} I prefer phrases like "handing over the baton". to be truthful, I am simply being an XSL renegade, and concentrating on PassiveTeX (the XSL FO equivalent of JadeTeX) sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Bug#45489: DAVENPORT: sgml2late, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | l10n problems in JadeTeX and Jade/O, Adam Di Carlo |
Re: langauges how?, Matthias Clasen | Date | Re: Getting selected PCDATA, Brandon Ibach |
Month |