Subject: Re: SOLUTION FOR : How can I add a new children in a node?? From: Brandon Ibach <bibach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 23:09:59 -0500 |
Quoting Aleksandar Bakic <bakicale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > You could also write (process-children), or just (pc) if you define it: > > > > (define (pc) (process-children)) > > > > which is what I do. > > Sorry if I am a bit off the topic, but can't you define pc like in > pure Scheme: > > (define pc process-children) > > ? > Yes. This would bind "pc" to the same procedure object that "process-children" is bound to. The other form would, theoretically, bind "pc" to a new, zero-argument, procedure object which simply calls the procedure to which "process-children" is bound at the time of the definition. I would think that a smart Scheme implementation would render these two the same, but I'm not positive. -Brandon :) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SOLUTION FOR : How can I add a , Aleksandar Bakic | Thread | Re: SOLUTION FOR : How can I add a , T. Kurt Bond |
Re: SOLUTION FOR : How can I add a , Aleksandar Bakic | Date | RE: XSL equivalent sought., Didier PH Martin |
Month |